From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Joyner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1997
237 A.D.2d 347 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 10, 1997.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), entered March 13, 1996, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Before: Mangano, P.J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of his motion for summary judgment, the defendant submitted reports from the injured Plaintiffs' treating physicians which clearly indicated that the Plaintiff's had satisfied the "serious injury" requirement of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Accordingly, the defendant's motion papers "failed to establish a prima facie case that [the Plaintiffs'] injuries were not serious" ( Mendola v Demetres, 212 AD2d 515). The subsequent sworn affirmations of one of these physicians, which were submitted by the Plaintiff's in opposition to the defendant's motion, "served only to underscore the defendantes] failure of proof ( Blusiewicz v Comeau, 212 AD2d 657).

Thus, the defendant's motion for summary judgment was properly denied.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Joyner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1997
237 A.D.2d 347 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Thomas v. Joyner

Case Details

Full title:LILLIE THOMAS et al., Respondents, v. HENRY G. JOYNER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 347 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 420

Citing Cases

Tsivikas v. Budget Rent a Car Systems, Inc.

The various medical opinions expressed by the plaintiff's treating doctors were supported by their respective…

Tillman v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus Auth

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. In support of their motion for summary…