From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Intercontinental Hotels Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:21-cv-04117-DSF-JEM (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-04117-DSF-JEM

11-15-2022

RICKA THOMAS, Plaintiff(s), v. INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP, PLC, et al., Defendant(s).


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

Dale S. Fischer, United States District Judge

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In this case, Intercontinental Hotels Group, PLC failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before November 29, 2022 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant(s) should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Intercontinental Hotels Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 15, 2022
2:21-cv-04117-DSF-JEM (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Thomas v. Intercontinental Hotels Grp.

Case Details

Full title:RICKA THOMAS, Plaintiff(s), v. INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP, PLC, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-04117-DSF-JEM (C.D. Cal. Nov. 15, 2022)