From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Fry

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 25, 2023
2:19-cv-01041 KJM CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)

Opinion

2:19-cv-01041 KJM CKD

01-25-2023

OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. FRY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Defendants' request for an extension time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 63). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' request for an extension of time is GRANTED. Defendants shall have until March 1, 2023, to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Fry

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 25, 2023
2:19-cv-01041 KJM CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)
Case details for

Thomas v. Fry

Case Details

Full title:OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. FRY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 25, 2023

Citations

2:19-cv-01041 KJM CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2023)