From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Dall. Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Dec 12, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-CV-1245-X-BH (N.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:21-CV-1245-X-BH

12-12-2022

NATHANIEL HOWARD THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

BRANTLEY STARR, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. [Doc. No. 11]. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Dall. Cnty.

United States District Court, Northern District of Texas
Dec 12, 2022
Civil Action 3:21-CV-1245-X-BH (N.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Thomas v. Dall. Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:NATHANIEL HOWARD THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. DALLAS COUNTY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Texas

Date published: Dec 12, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 3:21-CV-1245-X-BH (N.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2022)

Citing Cases

Davis v. UTMB

therefore [is] not a proper defendant in this case.” Thomas v. Dallas Cnty., No. 3:21-CV-1245-X (BH), 2022 WL…