From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Cnty. of Riverside

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 29, 2024
EDCV 23-0692-SVW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2024)

Opinion

EDCV 23-0692-SVW (AGR)

03-29-2024

CRAIG THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

STEPHEN V. WILSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the complaint, records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”) and the Objections. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's replevin motions (Dkt. Nos. 1,15) are denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice because the defects cannot be cured by amendment and requests for issuance of summons are denied.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Cnty. of Riverside

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 29, 2024
EDCV 23-0692-SVW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2024)
Case details for

Thomas v. Cnty. of Riverside

Case Details

Full title:CRAIG THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 29, 2024

Citations

EDCV 23-0692-SVW (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 29, 2024)