From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Carter

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Oct 31, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00133 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:22-CV-00133

10-31-2022

JEWELL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER CARTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM & RECOMMENDATION

DAVID S. MORALES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Mitchell Neurock's Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”). (D.E. 17). The M&R recommends that the Court: (1) DISMISS Plaintiffs § 1983 claims for money damages against the State of Texas and Christopher Carter and Bobby Lumpkin in their official capacities as barred by the Eleventh Amendment; and (2) DISMISS with prejudice Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment and ADA/RA claims against Christopher Carter and Bobby Lumpkin in their respective individual and official capacities as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1). Id. at 1-2. The M&R further recommends that the dismissal of the case count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff timely filed objections to the M&R. (D.E. 20).

After having carefully reviewed the proposed findings and conclusions of the M&R, the record, the applicable law, and having made a de novo review of the portions of the M&R to which Plaintiffs objections were directed, the Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs objections. (D.E. 20). Accordingly:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the M&R in its entirety. (D.E. 17).

(2) The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's § 1983 claims for money damages against the State of Texas and Christopher Carter and Bobby Lumpkin in their official capacities as barred by the Eleventh Amendment.

(3) The Court DISMISSES with prejudice Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment and ADA/RA claims against Christopher Carter and Bobby Lumpkin in their respective individual and official capacities as frivolous or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1).

(4) This dismissal is counted as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the Clerk of Court is ORDERED to send notice of this dismissal to the Manager of the Three Strikes List for the Southern District of Texas at ThreeStrikes@txs.uscourts .gov.

A final judgment will be entered separately.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Thomas v. Carter

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Oct 31, 2022
Civil Action 2:22-CV-00133 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Thomas v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:JEWELL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER CARTER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Oct 31, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:22-CV-00133 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 31, 2022)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Samuel

The undersigned observes that Plaintiff has already incurred two strikes, by virtue of the district court's…

Thomas v. Nino

When Thomas filed his notice of appeal and moved for leave to proceed IFP, he had, on at least three prior…