From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas v. Boyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 29, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01044-REB-CBS (D. Colo. May. 29, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01044-REB-CBS

05-29-2013

DEMETRIUS THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. NURSE PRACTITIONER BOYD, Defendant.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

This matter is before me on the following: (1) the Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgement [#93] and (2) the corresponding Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#104] filed March 25, 2013. I approve and adopt the recommendation and grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

"[#93]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

No objections to the recommendation were filed. Thus, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122.
--------

As detailed in the recommendation [#104], the plaintiff fails to establish both the objective and subjective components of an Eighth Amendment claim. In addition, the defendant is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity. On these bases, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment. The conclusions and recommendation of the magistrate judge are correct. Finding no error, much less plain error, in the disposition recommended by the magistrate judge, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted as an order of this court.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge[#104] filed March 25, 2013, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court;

2. That under FED. R. CIV. P.56, the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [#93] filed November 21, 2012, is GRANTED;

3. That the plaintiff's amended complaint [#9] is DISMISSED with prejudice;

4. That JUDGMENT SHALL ENTER in favor of the defendant, Nurse Practitioner Boyd, against the plaintiff, Demetrius Thomas, on all claims for relief and causes of action asserted in this case;

5. That the defendant is AWARDED her costs to be taxed by the clerk of the court in the time and manner prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1; and

6. That this case is CLOSED.

Dated May 29, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Thomas v. Boyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 29, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01044-REB-CBS (D. Colo. May. 29, 2013)
Case details for

Thomas v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:DEMETRIUS THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. NURSE PRACTITIONER BOYD, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 29, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01044-REB-CBS (D. Colo. May. 29, 2013)