Thomas v. Antipov

Full title: JAMAAL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. ANTIPOV, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 10, 2013

2:11-cv-1138-MCE-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 10, 2013)

Opinion

JAMAAL THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. ANTIPOV, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-1138-MCE-EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. September 10, 2013

          ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 12, 2013, he moved to amend his complaint to include the "attached sheet, " that he inadvertently omitted from the operative second amended complaint (ECF No. 45). The proposed amendment includes plaintiff's request for relief in this action. See ECF No. 83 at 10. Defendants do not oppose the amendment. ECF No. 84.

         Good cause appearing, plaintiff's motion to amend (ECF Nos. 82, 83) is granted. Defendants' answers to the second amended complaint are adequate and they are not required to file new answers.