From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thomas Marker Construction Co. v. Wal-Mart Stores

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jul 28, 2009
Case No. 3:06-cv-406 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 28, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cv-406.

July 28, 2009


ORDER


This matter came to be heard upon the joint motion of the parties pursuant to Fed.R. Cir P. 60(b), as contemplated in First National Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Hirsch, 535 F.2d 343 (6th Cir. 1976), asking this Court to vacate (1) this Court's judgment of January 15, 2009 (Doc. No. 211), and (2) its Opinion and Order, and corresponding judgment, of April 27, 2009 (Doc. No. 231). In accordance with their agreement, the parties also ask the Court to deny Thomas Marker's pending motion for attorney fees (Doc. No. 241) as moot, and dismiss all claims and counterclaims with prejudice.

Considering the parties' desire to settle and the entire record, the Court is of the opinion, and so finds, that should the case be remanded to it by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, this Court is inclined to grant the relief requested.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED BY THE COURT that the stay entered on July 6, 2009 is lifted;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if this case is remanded to this Court by the Court of Appeals, this Court is disposed to grant the parties' 60(b) motion; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case be continued, and all briefing deadlines suspended, pending remand by the Sixth Circuit.


Summaries of

Thomas Marker Construction Co. v. Wal-Mart Stores

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Jul 28, 2009
Case No. 3:06-cv-406 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 28, 2009)
Case details for

Thomas Marker Construction Co. v. Wal-Mart Stores

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS MARKER CONSTRUCTION CO., Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Jul 28, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cv-406 (S.D. Ohio Jul. 28, 2009)