From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 15, 1993
632 A.2d 700 (Conn. 1993)

Opinion

(14830)

Decided September 15, 1993


The plaintiffs Barbara Thoma and Theodore W. Dean's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 31 Conn. App. 643 (AC 11524), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (a) Canterbury Zoning Regulation 4.12.3 requires, as a condition precedent to subdivision approval, inland wetlands approval; and (b) the zoning regulation conflicts with General Statutes 8-26?"


Angela Hawkins Fichter, in support of the petition.

Edward E. Moukawsher, in opposition.


Summaries of

Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 15, 1993
632 A.2d 700 (Conn. 1993)
Case details for

Thoma v. Planning and Zoning Commission

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA THOMA ET AL. v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 15, 1993

Citations

632 A.2d 700 (Conn. 1993)
227 Conn. 910

Citing Cases

Thoma v. Planning Zoning Commission

We granted the plaintiffs' petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Did the…