Opinion
(Filed 12 May, 1920.)
CONTROVERSY without action, heard before Lane, J., at March Term, 1920, of MECKLENBURG.
Tillett Guthrie and C. H. Gover for plaintiff.
Cansler Cansler for defendant.
(For digest, see Wittson v. Dowling, ante, 542.)
The pertinent and controlling facts in this case are substantially the same as those of Wittson v. Dowling, ante, 542, and for the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment for plaintiff enforcing the contract of purchase is
Affirmed.