From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Thetford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 16, 1999
5 S.W.3d 478 (Ark. 1999)

Opinion

CR 99-1352

Opinion delivered December 16, 1999

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record of postconviciton proceedings was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

John Wesley Hall, Jr., for appellant.

No response.


Appellant Dana Daniel Thetford, by and through John Wesley Hall, Jr., attorney, has filed a motion for belated appeal. Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal from the denial of his postconviction relief pursuant to Rule 37 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. Attorney Hall admits by motion that the record of the postconviction proceedings was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

[1] We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Polletta v. State, 327 Ark. 677, 939 S.W.2d 310 (1997) ( per curiam); Guss v. State, 325 Ark. 521, 928 S.W.2d 336 (1996) ( per curiam); McCready v. State, 325 Ark. 418, 924 S.W.2d 813 (1996) ( per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Granted.


Summaries of

Thetford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Dec 16, 1999
5 S.W.3d 478 (Ark. 1999)
Case details for

Thetford v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dana Daniel THETFORD v . STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 16, 1999

Citations

5 S.W.3d 478 (Ark. 1999)
5 S.W.3d 478