Opinion
No. 36214
Decided December 9, 1959.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Criminal law — Habitual Criminal Act — Sections 2961.11, 2961.12 and 2961.13, Revised Code — Constitutionality — Construction — Indictment — Sufficiency — Evidence — Financial assistance — Due process — Section 10, Article I, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County.
Mr. John S. Ballard, prosecuting attorney, Mr. Joseph D. Roulhac and Mr. George Pappas, for appellee.
Mr. Walter B. Wanamaker, for appellant.
The appeal as of right herein is dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.