From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 10, 2015
1:15-cv-01137-MJS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2015)

Opinion

          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO AMEND ANSWER AND FILE MOTION TO STRIKE

          MICHAEL J. SENG, Magistrate Judge.

         Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC. and BEN WELLS (collectively, "Defendants"), and Plaintiff, THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows:

         RECITALS

         WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Damages and Demand for Jury Trial (the "Complaint") on July 22, 2015, in United Stated District Court, Eastern District of California, Case No. 1:15-cv-01137.

         WHEREAS, Defendants filed an Answer to the Complaint on October 5, 2015.

         WHEREAS, Defendants intend to voluntarily amend their Answer, and by previous Stipulation and Order, any Amended Answer must be filed on or before November 9, 2015.

         WHEREAS, in the event Defendants do not voluntarily amend their Answer, Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to extend the time for Plaintiff to file a Motion to Strike to on or before December 7, 2015.

         STIPULATION

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff and Defendants as follows:

         2. Should Defendants not file an Amended Answer, the time for Plaintiff to file a Motion to Strike shall be extended to December 7, 2015.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

          Matthew W. Quall, Quall Cardot LLP, Fresno, CA Attorneys for Defendants COURTESY OLDSMOBILE-CADILLAC, INC., a California corporation, and BEN WELLS, an individual

          George Fish, Attorneys for Plaintiff THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES

          WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to extend the time for Defendants to voluntarily amend their Answer to on or before November 23, 2015.

          1. The time for Defendants to file an Amended Answer shall be extended to on or before November 23, 2015.

          1. The time for Defendants to file an Amended Answer shall be extended to on or before November 23, 2015.


         2. Should Defendants not file an Amended Answer, the time for Plaintiff to file a Motion to Strike shall be extended to December 7, 2015.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

The Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Nov 10, 2015
1:15-cv-01137-MJS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2015)
Case details for

The Sherwin-Williams Co. v. Courtesy Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY, d/b/a SHERWIN-WILLIAMS AUTOMOTIVE FINISHES…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 10, 2015

Citations

1:15-cv-01137-MJS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 10, 2015)