From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Haze Corp. v. Sante Veritas Holdings, Inc.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 18, 2024
No. 87282 (Nev. Mar. 18, 2024)

Opinion

87282

03-18-2024

THE HAZE CORP., LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND THE HAZE CORP., AN ONTARIO CORPORATION, Appellants, v. SANTE VERITAS HOLDINGS, INC., A BRITISH COLUMBIA CORPORATION; SANTE VERITAS THERAPEUTICS INC., A BRITISH COLUMBIA CORPORATION; TILT HOLDINGS INC., A FOREIGN FOR PROFIT CORPORATION; AND TILT HOLDINGS US, INC., A DOMESTIC CORPORATION, Respondents.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order granting respondents' motion to dismiss, for lack of personal jurisdiction, an action alleging breach of contract and related claims. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge.

When our initial review of the notice of appeal and docketing statement revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, this court ordered appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In particular, the show cause order explained, it appeared that the district court had not yet entered a final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because appellants' claims against Brand Canna Growth Partners, Inc. remained pending. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996, P.2d 416, 417 (2000) ("[A] final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and costs.")' Appellants timely filed a response, and respondents timely filed a reply.

After considering the parties' arguments, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. As appellants recognize, their claims against Brand Canna remain pending, and the district court has not certified its order dismissing respondents from the action as final under NRCP 54(b). Consequently, no final judgment has been entered from which appellants can appeal. Since no final judgment exists and appellants have not otherwise demonstrated that the dismissal order is independently appealable, we lack jurisdiction and

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Stiglich, J., Pickering, J., Parraguirre, J.

Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge

Jay Young, Settlement Judge


Summaries of

The Haze Corp. v. Sante Veritas Holdings, Inc.

Supreme Court of Nevada
Mar 18, 2024
No. 87282 (Nev. Mar. 18, 2024)
Case details for

The Haze Corp. v. Sante Veritas Holdings, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THE HAZE CORP., LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND THE HAZE…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Mar 18, 2024

Citations

No. 87282 (Nev. Mar. 18, 2024)