From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Chemical Natl. Bk. of New York v. New York Dock Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1923
142 N.E. 283 (N.Y. 1923)

Opinion

Argued May 1, 1923

Decided May 29, 1923

Martin A. Schenck and Charles E. Hotchkiss for appellant.

George L. Kobbe for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ. Absent: ANDREWS, J.


Summaries of

The Chemical Natl. Bk. of New York v. New York Dock Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1923
142 N.E. 283 (N.Y. 1923)
Case details for

The Chemical Natl. Bk. of New York v. New York Dock Co.

Case Details

Full title:THE CHEMICAL NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v . NEW YORK DOCK…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1923

Citations

142 N.E. 283 (N.Y. 1923)
142 N.E. 283

Citing Cases

San Angelo, Etc., v. S. End W. Co.

In the case in hand plaintiff would have us follow the decision in Chemical Nat. Bank v. New York Dock Co.,…

Lutes v. Shenk

The proof before him showed that all of the documents or muniments of title to the property were held by Goal…