From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

The Atlanta Casualty Cos. v. Anites

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 8, 2000
753 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 4D99-1418.

Opinion filed March 8, 2000.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Ben L. Bryan, Jr., Judge; L.T. No. 97-689 CA.

Richard A. Sherman of Richard A. Sherman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale and Richard A. Giardino of Ligman, Martin Evans, P.L., Pompano Beach, for appellant.

William R. Ponsoldt, Jr. of Warner, Fox, Wackeen, Dungey, Seeley, Sweet Wright, L.L.P., Stuart, for appellee.


Appellant appeals from an order awarding attorney's fees on the ground that the trial court erred in applying a contingency risk multiplier where the requirements for such an award as set forth in Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. Quanstrom, 555 So.2d 828 (Fla. 1990), were not met.

The record on appeal contains sufficient evidence to support the trial court's application of the contingency risk multiplier. Therefore, we find that the trial court did not err in the amount of fees it awarded. However, we find that the trial court erred by not setting forth the specific findings as required by Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla. 1985), and we must remand for the entry of an order complete with findings as required by Rowe. See, e.g., Abdalla v. Southwind, Inc., 561 So.2d 468 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

The Atlanta Casualty Cos. v. Anites

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 8, 2000
753 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

The Atlanta Casualty Cos. v. Anites

Case Details

Full title:THE ATLANTA CASUALTY COMPANIES, a foreign corporation, Appellant, v. ANDRE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 8, 2000

Citations

753 So. 2d 657 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)