From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tharp v. A.M. Castle & Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 16, 2022
2:20-cv-11628-CAS (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-11628-CAS (AFMx)

03-16-2022

STEVE THARP, an individual, Plaintiff, v. A.M. CASTLE & CO., a corporate entity form unknown; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants.


Complaint Filed: November 5, 2020

Trial Dated: June 21, 2022

Alexander F. MacKinnon, J.

[PROPOSED] ODER GRANTING PARTIES' STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. RULE 41

Honorable Christina A. Snyder United States District Judge

Based on stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Steve Tharp's entire action as against all parties is dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and Rule 41(a)(1)(B) and that each party shall bear its own costs and fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Tharp v. A.M. Castle & Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 16, 2022
2:20-cv-11628-CAS (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Tharp v. A.M. Castle & Co.

Case Details

Full title:STEVE THARP, an individual, Plaintiff, v. A.M. CASTLE & CO., a corporate…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-11628-CAS (AFMx) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2022)