Opinion
No. 70914
09-16-2016
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to strike a request for a trial de novo after mandatory court-annexed arbitration proceedings.
Having considered the petition and appendix filed in this matter, we conclude that petitioners have not demonstrated that the district court arbitrarily or capriciously exercised its discretion. Int'l Game Tech., Inc. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 124 Nev. 193, 197, 179 P.3d 556, 558 (2008). Accordingly, our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is not warranted, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (holding that this court has the discretion to determine whether to consider a writ petition), and we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
/s/_________, C.J.
Parraguirre
/s/_________, J.
Hardesty
/s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Hon. Timothy C. Williams, District Judge
Nobles & Yanez Law Firm
Sklar Williams LLP
Eighth District Court Clerk