From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Texco, Inc. v. Zulily LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 26, 2024
2:23-cv-04857-CBM-(KSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-04857-CBM-(KSx)

01-26-2024

Texco, Inc. v. Zulily LLC et al.


Present: Honorable CONSUELO B. MARSHALL. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO FILE RULE 26(f) REPORT

Tire Court's order setting the scheduling conference required cotuisel to file a discovery plan pursuant to Rule 26(f) no later than 7 days prior to the scheduling conference. (Dkt. No. 18.) The filing of the report is also required under the Court's Standing Order. (Dkt. No. 13 (Standing Order) at 2:16-3:13.) The scheduling conference was then set for January 30, 2024, which meant that the parties were required to file a joint Rule 26(f) report no later than January 23, 2024. (Dkt. No. 26.) Neither party filed a Rule 26(f) report. The Standing Order states that “[a] Jomt Report which is not timely filed .. . may result hi the assessment of sanctions.” (Standing Order at 2:18-21.)

Therefore, both parties are ordered to show cause no later than February 13, 2024 why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to follow the Court's orders and file a joint Rule 26(f) report at least 7 days prior to the healing. The filing of a johit Rule 26(f) report by that date shall be deemed an adequate response to this Order to Show Cause.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Texco, Inc. v. Zulily LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 26, 2024
2:23-cv-04857-CBM-(KSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Texco, Inc. v. Zulily LLC

Case Details

Full title:Texco, Inc. v. Zulily LLC et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 26, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-04857-CBM-(KSx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)