From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tex. A&M Univ. v. Carapia

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 20, 2014
No. 10-14-00280-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2014)

Opinion

No. 10-14-00280-CV

11-20-2014

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, DAVE PARROTT, AND BG JOE RAMIREZ, Appellants v. GUSTAVO CARAPIA, Appellee


From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas
Trial Court No. 14-002220-CV-272

ORDER

Appellant's motion to substitute counsel was filed on November 13, 2014. The motion does not indicate that a copy was provided to the client in a manner of delivery authorized by the rule. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(b), (d). The Court simply reminds counsel of that obligation; but because the rule does not require counsel to certify compliance with that aspect of the rule to the Court, the Court will not deny the motion on that basis.

Accordingly, the Court grants the motion to substitute Susan M. Watson in place of Angela V. Colmenero.

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins
Motion granted
Order issued and filed November 20, 2014


Summaries of

Tex. A&M Univ. v. Carapia

STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
Nov 20, 2014
No. 10-14-00280-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Tex. A&M Univ. v. Carapia

Case Details

Full title:TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, DAVE PARROTT, AND BG JOE RAMIREZ, Appellants v…

Court:STATE OF TEXAS IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

Date published: Nov 20, 2014

Citations

No. 10-14-00280-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2014)