From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tevault v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 23, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

04-23-2015

In the Matter of Richard TEVAULT, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Richard Tevault, Malone, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), respondent.


Richard Tevault, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), respondent.

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a tier III disciplinary hearing finding him guilty of violating various prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner's institutional disciplinary record, and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner's inmate account. In view of this, and given that petitioner has received all of the relief to which he is entitled, the matter is dismissed as moot (see Matter of Ramos v. Department of Corr. & Community Supervision, 123 A.D.3d 1215, 1215, 995 N.Y.S.2d 866 [2014] ).

ADJUDGED that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

GARRY, J.P., ROSE, DEVINE and CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Tevault v. Prack

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Apr 23, 2015
127 A.D.3d 1483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Tevault v. Prack

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Richard TEVAULT, Petitioner, v. Albert PRACK, as Director…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 23, 2015

Citations

127 A.D.3d 1483 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 3434
5 N.Y.S.3d 918

Citing Cases

Woods v. Annucci

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…

Shields v. Prack

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination at issue has been administratively…