Teva Pharm. Indus. v. Ont. Teachers' Pension Plan Bd.

Full title: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., et al., Petitioners, v. Ontario…

Court: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 22, 2021

21-661 (2d Cir. Jun. 22, 2021)

Opinion

21-661

06-22-2021

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., et al., Petitioners, v. Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board, et al., Respondents.

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court

MANDATE

D. Conn.
17-cv-558
Underbill, C.J.

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 22^nd day of June, two thousand twenty-one. Present: Susan L. Carney, Richard J. Sullivan, Joseph F. Bianco, Circuit Judges. Petitioners request, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), leave to appeal the district court's order granting class certification, and move for leave to file a reply. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a reply is GRANTED, but the Rule 23(f) petition is DENIED because an immediate appeal is not warranted. See Sumitomo Copper Litig. v. Credit Lyonnais Rouse, Ltd., 262 F.3d 134, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2001).

FOR THE COURT:

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court

A True Copy

Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit