From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tetzlaff v. Incorporated Village of Amityville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1936
249 App. Div. 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

November 16, 1936.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Adel and Taylor, JJ.


Action by infant plaintiff for personal injuries by reason of tripping in a hole in a sidewalk causing a fracture of an ankle. Judgment of the County Court of Suffolk county in favor of plaintiff and order denying defendant's motion for a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs. While the depression, as described by plaintiff and her witnesses, was not more than four inches in depth, and was not of such character, taken alone, as to charge the village with negligence ( Lalor v. City of New York, 208 N.Y. 431), the court charged in effect that the jury could find that the depression, together with a recent fall of snow, constituted a trap. That was the theory upon which the case was tried, and the verdict thereon is sustained by the evidence.


Summaries of

Tetzlaff v. Incorporated Village of Amityville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1936
249 App. Div. 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Tetzlaff v. Incorporated Village of Amityville

Case Details

Full title:ELSIE TETZLAFF, an Infant, by FANNIE TETZLAFF, Her Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Jensen v. A.M. E. Realty Corporation

In those circumstances the existence of the hole, by itself, did not make out negligence on the part of the…