From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Testa v. Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Testa

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 2, 2016
186 So. 3d 614 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 4D15–1988.

03-02-2016

Frank A. TESTA, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o Laura TESTA, Appellee.

Frank A. Testa, Fort Lauderdale, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Frank A. Testa, Fort Lauderdale, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and William H. Branch, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion the circuit court's orders: (1) granting the Department of Revenue's motion for civil contempt against the father; and (2) denying the father's motion to vacate the contempt order and motion for rehearing. The father's argument that the circuit court erred in entering an order barring him from further pro se filing already was addressed in our case no. 4D15–1914, in which the father petitioned for a writ of certiorari. We granted the father's petition and quashed the order, with directions to issue an order to show cause and afford the father a reasonable time to respond before determining whether the sanction is appropriate. Testa v. Testa, 171 So.3d 244, 244–45 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and GERBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Testa v. Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Testa

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
Mar 2, 2016
186 So. 3d 614 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Testa v. Dep't of Revenue ex rel. Testa

Case Details

Full title:FRANK A. TESTA, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE o/b/o LAURA TESTA…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

186 So. 3d 614 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)