Opinion
No. 31461
Decided June 16, 1948.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Divorce and alimony — Action by husband against minor wife for divorce — Personal service on wife and her mother — Decree of divorce — Reciting case heard on petition and answer of guardian ad litem — Claim no such guardian ever appointed and fraud in obtaining decree — Petition to vacate filed after term — Award of alimony pendente lite — And order restraining husband from marrying — Due process — Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.
Mr. Harry J. Dworkin, for appellant.
Mr. Frank V. Opaskar, for appellee.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., TURNER, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, SOHNGEN and STEWART, JJ., concur.