Tenore v. Goodgame

Full title: MICHAEL TENORE, Plaintiff, v. NATHANAEL GOODGAME, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 9, 2013

2:11-cv-1082 WBS CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 9, 2013)

Opinion

MICHAEL TENORE, Plaintiff, v. NATHANAEL GOODGAME, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-1082 WBS CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. October 9, 2013

          ORDER

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         On September 5, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion to extend discovery. On September 26, 2013, plaintiff constructively filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges... shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days... from the date of service of the ruling on the parties." Id . Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of September 5, 2013, is therefore untimely. Moreover, even if plaintiff's motion were timely, it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See E.D. Local Rule 303(f).

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for reconsideration (ECF No. 50) is denied.