From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tellas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 1, 2002
811 So. 2d 756 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

holding that it was error to deny rule 3.850 motion as successive while appeal from previous 3.850 motion was pending; instead, trial court should have dismissed present motion raising the same claim pending on review for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Silvera v. State

Opinion

No. 1D01-3808.

March 1, 2002. Rehearing Denied April 1, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Charles W. Arnold, Jr., Judge.

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


The trial court denied as successive the appellant's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which was filed while an appeal of the appellant's previous rule 3.850 motion was pending in this Court. Because the appeal of that motion was pending when the trial court ruled upon the present motion, the trial court should have dismissed the present motion for lack of jurisdiction since the present motion raises the identical claim pending on review in the previous motion. See Williams v. State, 795 So.2d 975 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). Accordingly, we vacate the order denying the motion and remand for the trial court to dismiss the motion.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

BOOTH, BROWNING and POLSTON, JJ. concur.


Summaries of

Tellas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Apr 1, 2002
811 So. 2d 756 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

holding that it was error to deny rule 3.850 motion as successive while appeal from previous 3.850 motion was pending; instead, trial court should have dismissed present motion raising the same claim pending on review for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Silvera v. State
Case details for

Tellas v. State

Case Details

Full title:BENNIE FRANK TELLAS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Apr 1, 2002

Citations

811 So. 2d 756 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Silvera v. State

The circuit court found that it lacked jurisdiction because Silvera filed a notice of appeal from an order…

Peacock v. State

The postconviction court did not have jurisdiction to rule on Peacock's second rule 3.850 motion because the…