From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Telford Home Assistance, Inc. v. TPC Home Care Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 17, 1995
211 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

January 17, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the order dated July 26, 1994, is vacated, and, upon searching the record, the defendant is granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The parties are engaged in the business of providing health care services to Medicaid patients who are restricted to their homes, and obtain practically all of their patient referrals from the Nassau County Department of Social Services. In 1987 the plaintiff filed a Certificate of Assumed Name with the New York State Department of Health, indicating its intent to do business under the name "Extended Care". However, both its letterhead and its advertisements identify the plaintiff as "Extended Care Health Services". The defendant has conducted its business under the name "Extended Family Care". By this action the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendant's continued use of the name "Extended Family Care", alleging that such conduct constitutes unfair competition and has resulted in injury to its business.

In order to sustain a common-law cause of action to recover damages for unfair competition through the use of a trade name, the plaintiff must establish that the defendant's acts "constituted an unfair appropriation or exploitation of any special quality attached to plaintiff's name" (Buffalo Packaging Corp. v. Buff-Pac, Inc., 155 A.D.2d 877, 878). The plaintiff has failed to meet this burden, as the words "extended" and "care" are generic terms in the common domain, which lack any special qualities and merely describe the services provided by both parties (see, Sample, Inc. v. Porrath, 41 A.D.2d 118, 122, affd 33 N.Y.2d 961). In any event, there is no evidence in the record to support the conclusion that the plaintiff ever actually conducted business under the name "Extended Care". Thus, upon searching the record, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Miller, J.P., Lawrence, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Telford Home Assistance, Inc. v. TPC Home Care Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 17, 1995
211 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Telford Home Assistance, Inc. v. TPC Home Care Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TELFORD HOME ASSISTANCE, INC., Doing Business as EXTENDED CARE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 17, 1995

Citations

211 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
621 N.Y.S.2d 636

Citing Cases

Ivy League Sch., Inc. v. Danick Indus., Inc.

Misappropriation may include the misappropriation of trade mark or trade name. Such a claim requires a…

Telford Home Assistance v. TPC Home Care Servs., Inc.

Decided May 11, 1995 Appeal from (2d Dept: 211 A.D.2d 674) MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL GRANTED OR…