From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teeft v. Buffalo Dry Dock Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 25, 1913
101 N.E. 1123 (N.Y. 1913)

Opinion

Argued February 5, 1913

Decided February 25, 1913

Alfred L. Becker and Daniel E. Meegan for appellant.

W.J. Wetherbee and Hamilton Ward for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN and MILLER, JJ.


Summaries of

Teeft v. Buffalo Dry Dock Co.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 25, 1913
101 N.E. 1123 (N.Y. 1913)
Case details for

Teeft v. Buffalo Dry Dock Co.

Case Details

Full title:OLIVER J. TEEFT, Respondent, v . BUFFALO DRY DOCK COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 25, 1913

Citations

101 N.E. 1123 (N.Y. 1913)
101 N.E. 1123