From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Tedesco v. Murawski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

February 3, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Lawton, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs and motion denied. Memorandum: In the absence of "special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances spelled out in factual detail", Supreme Court should not have permitted a physical examination of plaintiff after the note of issue and statement of readiness had been filed (Laudico v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 125 A.D.2d 960, 961; see, 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]; Siegel, N.Y. Prac § 370 [2d ed]).


Summaries of

Tedesco v. Murawski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 3, 1995
212 A.D.2d 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Tedesco v. Murawski

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA J. TEDESCO, Appellant, v. LEONARD J. MURAWSKI, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 3, 1995

Citations

212 A.D.2d 1053 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
624 N.Y.S.2d 1007