From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Teachers' Ret. Sys. of La. v. General re Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware
Dec 29, 2010
11 A.3d 228 (Del. 2010)

Summary

recognizing that, in a derivative action against the "human agents" of the corporation, there is "no suit by a co-conspirator, on the one hand, and its partner in crime on the other . . . because corporate agents (be they directors, officers, employees or outside contractors) do not conspire with the corporation when they work together to cause the corporation to act. Rather, the agents' actions are the actions of the corporation itself, and if those actions involve concerted illegal activity with another corporation, it is the two corporations who are, at core, the co-conspirators"

Summary of this case from Buttonwood Tree Value Partners, L.P. v. Polk

Opinion

Nos. 451, 2009, 574, 2009.

December 29, 2010.

Court Below: Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, C.A. Nos. 753, 769.

Before STEELE, Chief Justice, and HOLLAND, BERGER, JACOBS, AND RIDGELY, Justices, constituting the court en banc.


ORDER


This 29th day of December 2010, upon consideration of the briefs of the parties, and their contentions in oral argument, it appears to the Court that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons set forth in its decision dated June 17, 2009.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Teachers' Ret. Sys. of La. v. General re Corp.

Supreme Court of Delaware
Dec 29, 2010
11 A.3d 228 (Del. 2010)

recognizing that, in a derivative action against the "human agents" of the corporation, there is "no suit by a co-conspirator, on the one hand, and its partner in crime on the other . . . because corporate agents (be they directors, officers, employees or outside contractors) do not conspire with the corporation when they work together to cause the corporation to act. Rather, the agents' actions are the actions of the corporation itself, and if those actions involve concerted illegal activity with another corporation, it is the two corporations who are, at core, the co-conspirators"

Summary of this case from Buttonwood Tree Value Partners, L.P. v. Polk

declining to extend the adverse interest exception where the "Complaint plainly pleads that AIG's participation in each of the schemes resulted in tangible (if eventually short-lived) benefits to the corporation"

Summary of this case from Channel Medsystems v. Bos. Sci. Corp.
Case details for

Teachers' Ret. Sys. of La. v. General re Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. General RE Corp

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Dec 29, 2010

Citations

11 A.3d 228 (Del. 2010)

Citing Cases

Yao-Yi v. Wilmington Trust Co.

Nonetheless, the parties have not cited to any case law indicating that Delaware law departs from the narrow…

Sun Life Assurance Co. v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n

Id. (quoting In re Am. Int'l Grp., Inc., Consol. Derivative Litig., 976 A.2d 872, 888 (Del. Ch. 2009) aff'd…