From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richard v. Long

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
May 11, 2017
NUMBER 13-16-00640-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2017)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-16-00640-CV

05-11-2017

TROY RICHARD TDCJ #1881194, Appellant, v. KENDRA LONG, ET AL., Appellee.


On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Contreras, Benavides, and Longoria
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on March 29, 2017. On April 18, 2017, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the court's letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b)(c).

GINA M. BENAVIDES,

Justice Delivered and filed the 11th day of May, 2017.


Summaries of

Richard v. Long

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
May 11, 2017
NUMBER 13-16-00640-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2017)
Case details for

Richard v. Long

Case Details

Full title:TROY RICHARD TDCJ #1881194, Appellant, v. KENDRA LONG, ET AL., Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: May 11, 2017

Citations

NUMBER 13-16-00640-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2017)