Opinion
Case No. 2:13-cv-690
04-08-2014
Judge Marbley
Magistrate Judge King
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
This action was filed on July 17, 2013. On November 15, 2013, the Court granted plaintiff an additional 120 days to demonstrate effective service of process in this action. Order, Doc. No. 8. The Court warned plaintiff that failure to demonstrate effective service would "result in the dismissal of the claims asserted against any defendant not so served." Id. Plaintiff has not demonstrated effective service on any defendant. The Court therefore RECOMMENDS that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
___________________
Norah McCann King
United States Magistrate Judge