From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Villalobos

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 23, 2015
CV 13-5170-RGK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2015)

Opinion

          Shauntae R Taylor, Plaintiff, Pro se, Tehachapi, CA.

          For Sergeant F Villalobos, Individual, Captain R Fritz, Individual, Correctional Officer M Mateo, Individual, Defendants: Danielle Rachel Hemple, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed herein. Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,

         IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Villalobos

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 23, 2015
CV 13-5170-RGK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Taylor v. Villalobos

Case Details

Full title:SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT F. VILLALOBOS, ET AL, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 23, 2015

Citations

CV 13-5170-RGK (DTB) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2015)