From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 14, 2022
352 So. 3d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-2597.

12-14-2022

James TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

James Taylor, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate , Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


James Taylor, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate , Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the pleading pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State, 770 So.2d 206 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the pleading pending below).

Lewis, Kelsey, and Winokur, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Dec 14, 2022
352 So. 3d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:James TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

352 So. 3d 937 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)