From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. State

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Apr 18, 2019
No. 11-18-00258-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2019)

Opinion

No. 11-18-00258-CR

04-18-2019

LACEY ODELL TAYLOR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee


On Appeal from the 70th District Court Ector County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. A-16-1454-CR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The jury convicted Lacey Odell Taylor of two counts of tampering with physical evidence: the first count related to a human corpse and the second related to cleaning the crime scene. Appellant pleaded true to an enhancement allegation, and the jury assessed his punishment at confinement for sixty years for the first count and twenty years for the second count. We affirm.

Appellant's court-appointed counsel has filed in this court a motion to withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of both the clerk's record and the reporter's record. Counsel advised Appellant of his right to review the record and file a response to counsel's brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals seeking review by that court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. Court-appointed counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Appellant has not filed a response to counsel's Anders brief. Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have independently reviewed the record, and we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit.

We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 68.

We grant counsel's motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

PER CURIAM April 18, 2019 Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,
Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J. Willson, J., not participating.

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.


Summaries of

Taylor v. State

State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals
Apr 18, 2019
No. 11-18-00258-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2019)
Case details for

Taylor v. State

Case Details

Full title:LACEY ODELL TAYLOR, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court:State of Texas in the Eleventh Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 18, 2019

Citations

No. 11-18-00258-CR (Tex. App. Apr. 18, 2019)