From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Searcy, Denney, Scarola

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 29, 1992
596 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 92-0056.

April 29, 1992.

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Palm Beach County; John D. Wessel, Judge.

Gary, Williams, Parenti Taylor, P.A., Stuart, Larry Klein and Randy D. Ellison of Klein Walsh, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart Shipley, P.A., and Philip M. Burlington of Edna L. Caruso, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


AFFIRMED.

LETTS and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., dissents with opinion.


This is an appeal from an order enjoining a lawyer from any contact with clients of his former law firm. While there may be substantial questions involved as to the ethical propriety of the lawyer's conduct, as well as questions of the lawyer's potential civil liability for interference with the former firm's relationship with its clients, I do not believe those matters are sufficient to bar all communications between the lawyer and the clients, especially since the clients have a right to choose counsel, regardless of the wisdom of that choice. Cf. State ex rel. Branch v. DuVal, 249 So.2d 468 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).


Summaries of

Taylor v. Searcy, Denney, Scarola

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 29, 1992
596 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Taylor v. Searcy, Denney, Scarola

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP H. TAYLOR AND GARY, WILLIAMS, PARENTI TAYLOR, P.A., F/K/A GARY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 29, 1992

Citations

596 So. 2d 1287 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)