From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Rozum

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 17, 2005
Civil Action No. 05-2504 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2005)

Summary

declining to apply equitable tolling because the fact that the petitioner was young, confused, and unfamiliar with the judicial system did not rise to an extraordinary circumstance

Summary of this case from Ramirez v. Richard

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-2504.

October 17, 2005


ORDER


AND NOW, on this ____ day of October, 2005, upon careful and independent consideration of the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation (the "RR") of United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Smith (Doc. 6), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED;

3. A certificate of appealability is NOT GRANTED.

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case as CLOSED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Rozum

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 17, 2005
Civil Action No. 05-2504 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2005)

declining to apply equitable tolling because the fact that the petitioner was young, confused, and unfamiliar with the judicial system did not rise to an extraordinary circumstance

Summary of this case from Ramirez v. Richard
Case details for

Taylor v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:OLLIE TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. GERALD ROZUM, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 17, 2005

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-2504 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2005)

Citing Cases

Ramirez v. Richard

Further, he fails to explain how his youth affected his ability to understand the legal procedures to file a…