(noting that undated, unnotarized “affidavits” are neither admissible nor proper declarations under penalty of perjury). See Taylor v. Principi, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2159, at *9 (D. Kan. Feb. 4, 2004) (“Documents filed are inadmissible when they are not accompanied by affidavits attesting to the validity of the documents.
See [Doc. 247]; see also [Doc. 236 at 2]. Defendant's Motion to Add Additional Remedy contained the same lack of supporting 12 authority, see generally [Doc. 211], which caused the court to expend its finite judicial resources conducting its own independent research to explain to Defendant the numerous reasons why its Motion to Add Additional Remedy and the requests therein lacked merit. See, e.g., [Doc. 236 at 3-4]; cf. Taylor v. Principi, No. 02-4083-JAR, 2004 WL 303208, at *10 (D. Kan. Feb. 4, 2004), aff'd, 141 Fed.Appx. 705 (10th Cir. 2005) (unpublished) (“Plaintiff's failure to cite to any authority that goes to the merits of Plaintiff's case is an oversight that is not acceptable to the Court.