From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial Dist. Attorney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 12, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2660-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2660-G (BH)

12-12-2017

KEVIN RAY TAYLOR, ID # 2070100, Petitioner, v. PRESIDING JUDGE, 291ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge are correct and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.

For the reasons stated in the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The case will be dismissed by separate judgment for failure to prosecute or follow court orders.

SO ORDERED. December 12, 2017.

/s/ _________

A. JOE FISH

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Taylor v. Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial Dist. Attorney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Dec 12, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2660-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2017)
Case details for

Taylor v. Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial Dist. Attorney

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN RAY TAYLOR, ID # 2070100, Petitioner, v. PRESIDING JUDGE, 291ST…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Dec 12, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-2660-G (BH) (N.D. Tex. Dec. 12, 2017)