From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 21, 2024
8:15-cv-01768-JLS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)

Opinion

8:15-cv-01768-JLS-DFM

03-21-2024

Jacqueline Taylor v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC


Present: Honorable JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

On March 1, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Order to Show Cause (“OSC”), Doc. 12.) The action was remanded to this Court from multi-district litigation in the Southern District of California, MDL 2295, but Plaintiff never filed the underlying MDL record as required following remand. (Id.) Plaintiff also failed to respond to the Court's OSC. Instead, the Court received a notice of non-opposition to dismissal of the matter, filed by Defendant, representing that, “pursuant to settlement between the parties,” Defendant did not oppose the Court dismissing the action. (Notice, Doc. 14.) Based on Plaintiff's failure to respond to the OSC, Plaintiff's lack of prosecution of the action following remand, Defendant's non-opposition to dismissal, and the representation that there is a settlement between the parties, the Court DISMISSES THE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) (dismissal for failure to prosecute “operates as an adjudication on the merits”).


Summaries of

Taylor v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Mar 21, 2024
8:15-cv-01768-JLS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Taylor v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs.

Case Details

Full title:Jacqueline Taylor v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Mar 21, 2024

Citations

8:15-cv-01768-JLS-DFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2024)