From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Kashubeck

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 19, 2010
Civil Action 2:09-CV-518 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 19, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:09-CV-518.

February 19, 2010


ORDER


On January 26, 2010, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief be denied, and that the motions filed by defendants to dismiss or for summary judgment on plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief be denied as moot. It was further recommended that plaintiff's motion to "quash" the defendants' motion to dismiss the claims for injunctive relief, Doc. No. 46, be denied as moot. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation.

The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief, Doc. Nos. 7, 11, 61 and 63 are DENIED; the motions filed by defendants to dismiss or for summary judgment on plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief, Doc. Nos. 33, 40, are DENIED as moot; plaintiff's motion to "quash" the defendants' motion to dismiss the claims for injunctive relief, Doc. No. 46, is likewise DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Kashubeck

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Feb 19, 2010
Civil Action 2:09-CV-518 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 19, 2010)
Case details for

Taylor v. Kashubeck

Case Details

Full title:BRENTFORD TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. DR. KASHUBECK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Feb 19, 2010

Citations

Civil Action 2:09-CV-518 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 19, 2010)