From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Hartley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 14, 2011
CV 06-6591-SJO (CW) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2011)

Opinion


ALONZO LEE TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 06-6591-SJO (CW) United States District Court, C.D. California. April 14, 2011

          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has reviewed the entire record in this action, as well as the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and objections thereto. The court has made a de novo determination with respect to those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection has been made.

         IT IS ORDERED: (1) that the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge be accepted; and (2) that judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order and the judgment herein be served on the parties.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Hartley

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 14, 2011
CV 06-6591-SJO (CW) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Taylor v. Hartley

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO LEE TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 14, 2011

Citations

CV 06-6591-SJO (CW) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2011)