From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Fowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2013
No. 2:12-CV-2901-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:12-CV-2901-JAM-CMK

01-03-2013

BERNARD GLEN TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. FOWELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. At the time the case was filed, the Clerk of the Court designated the matter a prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, however, does not appear to be incarcerated given that he provides a non-prison address in Sacramento, California. For this reason, and to avoid the necessity of plaintiff appearing before the undersigned in Redding, California, the action shall be re-designated as a civil pro se (non-prisoner) action and re-assigned randomly to a Magistrate Judge sitting in Sacramento.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Taylor v. Fowell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 3, 2013
No. 2:12-CV-2901-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Taylor v. Fowell

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD GLEN TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. FOWELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

No. 2:12-CV-2901-JAM-CMK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)