From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Experian

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 21, 2023
1:23-cv-506 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-506

09-21-2023

LINDSEY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN, et al., Defendant.


ENTRY AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

MATTHEW W. McFARLAND JUDGE

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Karen L. Litkovitz (Doc. 4), to whom this case is referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Petitioner failed to timely file any objections to the Report and Recommendations in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). Thus, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the following:

1. Plaintiffs Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
2. The Court CERTIFIES pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that, for the reasons outlined in the Report and Recommendation, an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith. Plaintiff is therefore DENIED leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. U.S. Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997).
3. This matter is TERMINATED from the Court's docket.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Taylor v. Experian

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Sep 21, 2023
1:23-cv-506 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Taylor v. Experian

Case Details

Full title:LINDSEY TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Sep 21, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-506 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 21, 2023)