Summary
holding an order of remand by the Superior Court to the Industrial Accident Board is interlocutory
Summary of this case from Christiana Care Health, Servs., Inc. v. LuceOpinion
Submitted December 17, 1981.
Decided December 30, 1981.
Upon appeal from Superior Court. Appeal dismissed.
John J. Schmittinger, of Schmittinger Rodriguez, Dover, for appellant.
Robert W. Ralston, of Prickett, Jones, Elliott, Kristol Schnee, Wilmington, for appellee.
Before HERRMANN, C. J., DUFFY and McNEILLY, JJ.
In this case, which arises under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 19 Del. C. § 2301, the Superior Court entered an order of remand to the Industrial Accident Board with instructions to take further testimony, including expert medical testimony, on the issue as to when disfigurement of the claimant became permanent. Thereafter, the employee docketed this appeal.
Clearly, an order of remand by the Superior Court to the Industrial Accident Board is an interlocutory and not a final order. And under settled Delaware law such an order is not appealable to this Court. Cicamore v. Alloy Surfaces Company, Del.Supr., 244 A.2d 278 (1968); McClelland v. General Motors Corporation, Del.Supr., 214 A.2d 847 (1965).
After those cases were decided, this Court adopted Rule 42 which specifies the procedure governing interlocutory appeals. But that Rule did not change nor modify the decisions in Cicamore and McClelland. Indeed, the Rule codifies those and similar decisions and adds additional requirements which have not been met in this appeal.
It follows, therefore, that the appeal must be dismissed.