From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. City of Hackensack

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 20, 1948
62 A.2d 686 (N.J. 1948)

Opinion

Argued December 13, 1948 —

Decided December 20, 1948.

Mr. David Cohn argued the cause for the prosecutors-appellants ( Mr. Herman Greenstone, attorney; Mr. Abram Simon, on the brief).

Mr. Ralph W. Chandless argued the cause for the defendant-respondent, The City of Hackensack (Messrs. Chandless, Weller, Kramer Frank, attorneys; Mr. Ernest Weller, on the brief).

Mr. John J. Breslin argued the cause for the defendants-respondents Fred Ingannamort et al. ( Mr. George I. Marcus, attorney).


The judgment under review will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Eastwood.

For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices CASE, HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD and ACKERSON — 6.

For reversal: None.


Summaries of

Taylor v. City of Hackensack

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Dec 20, 1948
62 A.2d 686 (N.J. 1948)
Case details for

Taylor v. City of Hackensack

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD TAYLOR, ET AL., PROSECUTORS-APPELLANTS, v. THE CITY OF HACKENSACK…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Dec 20, 1948

Citations

62 A.2d 686 (N.J. 1948)
62 A.2d 686

Citing Cases

Union Co. Indust. Park v. Union Co. Park Com

In view of our holding above that there is no such restriction and that the residential use is merely a…

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

In the Matter of Stein, 1 N.J. 228, 62 A.2d 801 (1949). Taylor v. City of Hackensack, 1 N.J. 211, 62 A.2d 686…