From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Taylor v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Sep 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-1158-O (N.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-1158-O

09-14-2011

UWE R. TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation in this case (ECF No. 23), on June 27, 2011. Plaintiffs filed objections, and the District Court has made a de novo review of those portions of the proposed findings and recommendation to which objection was made. The objections are overruled, and the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Reed O'Connor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Taylor v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Sep 14, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-1158-O (N.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Taylor v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:UWE R. TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Sep 14, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-1158-O (N.D. Tex. Sep. 14, 2011)

Citing Cases

Rollins v. Berryhill

If the ALJ does not use the correct standard, the court must remand the claim to the Commissioner for…

Caperton v. Berryhill

If the ALJ does not use the correct standard, the court must remand the claim to the Commissioner for…