denying certiorari in Tatum v. Lewis, 184 F. App'x 646, 647-48 (9th Cir. 2006) ("Even if the district court was required to take into account the [petitioner]'s equities in ruling on [his] Rule 41(a) motion, it did so by correctly advising [him] of the potential consequences of the dismissal of his petition.")
Summary of this case from German v. GasteloNo. 06-8655.
March 5, 2007.
Certiorari Denied.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
denying certiorari in Tatum v. Lewis, 184 F. App'x 646, 647-48 (9th Cir. 2006) ("Even if the district court was required to take into account the [petitioner]'s equities in ruling on [his] Rule 41(a) motion, it did so by correctly advising [him] of the potential consequences of the dismissal of his petition.")
Summary of this case from German v. GasteloFull title:TATUM v. YATES, WARDEN
Court:U.S.
Date published: Mar 5, 2007
The ex parte order allowing the substitution by defendant sua sponte of an amended bond correcting an…
German v. GasteloIn light of Respondent's lack of opposition and Petitioner's failure to file a reply even after the Court…